Examples of the very best abstracts submitted to the 2012-2013 selection that is abstract for the ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.

Examples of the very best abstracts submitted to the 2012-2013 selection that is abstract for the ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.

Sample 1: “Asserting Rights, Reclaiming Space: District of Marshpee v. Phineas Fish, 1833-1843”

From May of 1833 to March of 1834, the Mashpee Wampancag tribe of Cape Cod Massachusetts waged an campaign that is aggressive gain political and religious autonomy from the state. In March of 1834, the Massachusetts legislature passed an act disbanding the white guardians appointed to conduct affairs for the Mashpee tribe and incorporated Mashpee as an Indian district. The Mashpee tribe’s fight to bring back self-government and control of land and resources represents an important “recover of Native space.” Equally significant is exactly what happened once that space was recovered.

The topic of this paper addresses an understudied and period that is essential the annals of the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe. Despite a growing body of literature on the Mashpee, scholars largely neglect the time between 1834 and 1869. This paper looks due to the fact Mashpee tribe’s campaign to dismiss Harvard appointed minister Phineas Fish; the battle to regain the parsonage he occupied, its resources, plus the community meetinghouse. This paper will argue the tribe asserted its power in the political and physical landscape to reclaim their meetinghouse together with parsonage land. Ultimately, this assertion contributed to shaping, strengthening, and remaking community identity that is mashpee. This study examines legislative reports, petitions, letters, and legal documents to make a narrative of Native agency into the antebellum period. Note: This is a component of my larger thesis project (in progress0 “Mashpee Wampanoag Government Formation and also the Evolving Community Identity into the District of Marshpee, 1834-1849.”

Sample 2: “Private Paths to Public Places: Local Actors plus the development of National Parklands into the American South”

This paper explores the connections between private individuals, government entities, and organizations that are non-governmental the development of parklands through the American South. An investigation of parklands in the Southern United States reveals a reoccurring connection between private initiative and park creation while current historiography primarily credits the federal government with the creation of parks and protection of natural wonders. Secondary literature occasionally reflects the significance of local and non-government sources when it comes to preservation of land, yet these works still emphasize the necessity of a national bureaucracy setting the tone fore the parks movement. Some works, including Jacoby’s Crimes Against Nature examine local actors, but give attention to opposition to your imposition of new rules governing land when confronted with some outside threat. The importance of local individuals in the creation of parklands remains and understudies aspect of American environmental history in spite of scholarly recognition of non-government agencies and local initiative. Several examples into the American South raise concerns about the narrative that is traditional governmental hegemony against local resistance. This paper argues for widespread, sustained curiosity about both nature preservation plus in creating spaces for public recreation during the local level, and finds that the “private way to public parks” merits further investigation.

Note: This paper, entitled “Private Paths to Public Parks into the American South” was subsequently selected for publication when you look at the NC State Graduate Journal of History.

Sample 3: Untitled

Previous generations of English Historians have produced an abundant literature about the Levellers and their role into the English Civil Wars (1642-1649), primarily focused on the Putney Debates and their contributions to Anglophone legal and thought that is political. Typically, their push to increase the franchise and espousal of a theory of popular sovereignty has been central to accounts of Civil War radicalism. Other revisionist accounts depict them as a fragmented sect of millenarian radicals whose religious bent marginalized and possibility that they could make lasting contributions to English politics or society. This paper seeks to find a Leveller theory of religious toleration, while explaining how their conception of political activity overlapped their religious ideas. As opposed to focusing on John Lilburne, often taken once the public face for the Leveller movement, this paper will concentrate on the equally interesting and a lot more thinker that is consistent William Walwyn. Surveying his personal background, published writings, popular involvement into the Leveller movement, and attacks launched by his critics, i really hope to declare that Walwyn’s unique contribution to Anglophone political thought was his defense of religious pluralism in the face of violent sectarians who sought to wield control of the Church of England. Although the Levellers were ultimately suppressed, Walwyn’s dedication to a tolerant society and a secular state shouldn’t be minimized but instead seen as element of a larger debate about Church-State relations across early modern Europe. Ultimately this paper aims to contribute to the historiography that is rich of toleration and popular politics more broadly.

Sample 4: “Establishing a National Memory of Citizen Slaughter: a full case Study associated with First Memory Site to Mass Murder in United States History – Edmond, Oklahoma, 1986-1989”

Since 1989, memory sites to events of mass murder have not only proliferated rapidly–they have become the expectation that is normative American society. When it comes to great majority of American history, however, events commonly defined as “mass murder” have led to no permanent memory sites plus the sites of perpetration themselves have traditionally been either obliterated or rectified so that both the city additionally the nation could forget the tragedy and move on. This all changed on May 29, 1989 when the community of Edmond, Oklahoma officially dedicated the “Golden Ribbon” memorial towards the thirteen people killed in the infamous “post office shooting” of 1986. In this paper I investigate the outcome of Edmond so that you can understand why it became the first memory site for this kind in United States history. I argue that the tiny town of Edmond’s unique political abnormalities on the day associated with the shooting, in conjunction with the total that is near involvement established ideal conditions when it comes to emergence of the unique style of memory site. I also conduct a historiography regarding the usage of “the ribbon” to be able to illustrate how this has end up being https://eliteessaywriters.com the symbol of memories of violence and death in American society within the late century that is 20th. Lastly, I illustrate how the lack that is notable of between people mixed up in Edmond and Oklahoma City cases after the 1995 Murrah Federal Building bombing–despite the close geographic and temporal proximity of these cases–illustrates this routinely isolated nature of commemorating mass murder and starkly renders the surprising amount of aesthetic similarities that these memory sites share.

Sample 5: “Roman Urns and Sarcophagi: The Quest for Postmortem Identity through the Pax Romana”

“If you want to know who I am, the answer is ash and burnt embers;” thus read an anonymous early Roman’s burial inscription. The Romans dealt with death in many ways which incorporated a variety of cultural conventions and beliefs–or non-beliefs as in the case of the “ash and embers.” Because of the turn for the first century with this era, the Romans practiced cremation almost exclusively–as the laconic eloquence of the anonymous Roman also succinctly explained. Cremation vanished by the next century, replaced by the practice regarding the distant past by the fifth century. Burial first started initially to take hold in the western Roman Empire throughout the early century that is second utilizing the appearance of finely-crafted sarcophagi, but elites from the Roman world would not discuss the practices of cremation and burial at length. Therefore archaeological evidence, primarily in form of burial vessels such as urns and sarcophagi represented the sole place to seek out investigate the transitional to inhumation in the Roman world. This paper analyzed a little corpus of such vessels to be able to identify symbolic elements which demarcate individual identities in death, comparing the patterns among these symbols to your fragments of text available relating to death into the Roman world. The analysis determined that the transition to inhumantion was a movement caused by an increased desire from the element of Romans to preserve identity in death during and following the Pax Romana.

Lascia un commento

18 + 16 =